Dealers invest millions of dollars representing brands they ultimately do not control.
That becomes a serious problem when an outside event makes the franchise economically impossible to continue.
Polestar’s situation raises a broader industry question. If regulation, tariffs, ownership restrictions or another government action effectively forces an automaker out of the U.S., what happens to the dealers who invested in facilities, employees, inventory and market development based on that franchise agreement?
The OEM may argue that the event was outside its control. The dealer can make the same argument.
Should manufacturers still be required to compensate dealers for fair market value and provide long-term parts, warranty and service support? Or is government intervention a legitimate force-majeure event where everyone absorbs their own loss?
As automotive policy becomes increasingly unpredictable, this may eventually affect far more brands than Polestar.
Add new comment